<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call of Duty: World at War details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mywiinews.com/call-of-duty-world-at-war-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mywiinews.com/call-of-duty-world-at-war-details/</link>
	<description>Your Wii Guide to Gaming</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WorldWar</title>
		<link>http://www.mywiinews.com/call-of-duty-world-at-war-details/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>WorldWar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mywiinews.com/?p=827#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>sounds pretty amazing to me i can't wait ive been waiting for a long time now for a decent online wii game i got the wii when it was first released soo im occupying myself with medal of honor heroes 2 which is okay but the damage is fucked up on it soo im really looking forward to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds pretty amazing to me i can&#8217;t wait ive been waiting for a long time now for a decent online wii game i got the wii when it was first released soo im occupying myself with medal of honor heroes 2 which is okay but the damage is fucked up on it soo im really looking forward to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Wii News Countdown: Top 3 Upcoming Wii First Person Shooters - My Wii News</title>
		<link>http://www.mywiinews.com/call-of-duty-world-at-war-details/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>My Wii News Countdown: Top 3 Upcoming Wii First Person Shooters - My Wii News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mywiinews.com/?p=827#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>[...] Last year, Infinity Ward released one of the best first-person shooters of all time. It delivered amazing graphics, a remarkable campaign, and an entertaining online multiplayer mode. This year Treyarch, makers of both Call of Duty 2: Big Red One and Call of Duty 3, are giving the WW2 world another shot with Call of Duty: World at War. This latest fps, said to be the best looking war-time shooter ever, will be running on the Wii with the Call of Duty 4 engine. Treyarch also introduced a mode that will feature four player co-op via Xbox Live, but it is unknown if this will reach the Wii version. However, we will definitely see split-screen co-op, which is a good sign. Unlike Call of Duty 4, the campaign and multiplayer modes will feature vehicular gameplay which I&#8217;m sure some people are happy about. Also the developers noted that Call of Duty: World at War is more violent then any Call of Duty game they have ever done. For a more in-depth preview check out our article: here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last year, Infinity Ward released one of the best first-person shooters of all time. It delivered amazing graphics, a remarkable campaign, and an entertaining online multiplayer mode. This year Treyarch, makers of both Call of Duty 2: Big Red One and Call of Duty 3, are giving the WW2 world another shot with Call of Duty: World at War. This latest fps, said to be the best looking war-time shooter ever, will be running on the Wii with the Call of Duty 4 engine. Treyarch also introduced a mode that will feature four player co-op via Xbox Live, but it is unknown if this will reach the Wii version. However, we will definitely see split-screen co-op, which is a good sign. Unlike Call of Duty 4, the campaign and multiplayer modes will feature vehicular gameplay which I&#8217;m sure some people are happy about. Also the developers noted that Call of Duty: World at War is more violent then any Call of Duty game they have ever done. For a more in-depth preview check out our article: here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

